Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Later Model is Olympus TG-6
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was revealed 7 years before the TG-5 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-H20G grades vs the TG-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus Tough TG-5. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus TG-5
| EX-H20G | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Casio EX-H20G
| TG-5 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 81 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-5
| EX-H20G | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus TG-5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the TG-5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and TG-5 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and TG-5.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to give extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2017-05-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $449 |