Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was launched 23 months before the VH-410 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-H20G grades versus the VH-410 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus VH-410. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus VH-410
| EX-H20G | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-H20G
| VH-410 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 23 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus VH-410
| EX-H20G | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H20G against the VH-410.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and VH-410 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and VH-410.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VH-410 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus VH-410 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $186 |