Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was revealed 10 months prior to the VR-320 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-H20G grades vs the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-H20G | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-H20G
| VR-320 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 10 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus VR-320
| EX-H20G | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has got outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G against the VR-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The picture below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you should always factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography info
has manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H20G as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than average (216g)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-H20G
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-H20G
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average (216g)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-H20G
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic port
heavier than average (216 grams)
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $179 |
