Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was introduced 4 months before the VR-330 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-H20G grades against the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-H20G | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-H20G
| VR-330 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Olympus VR-330
| EX-H20G | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 | February 2011 | Similar generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has outside measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G versus the VR-330.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and VR-330.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution and you should expect similar quality of photographs but you would want to factor the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $220 |