Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H20G and Pentax WG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Pentax. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H20G was revealed 3 years earlier than the WG-3 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-H20G scores against the WG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Pentax WG-3. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-H20G | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-3 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2013 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 34 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Pentax WG-3
| EX-H20G | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G and Pentax WG-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G versus the WG-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and WG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and WG-3.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 to deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Pentax |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Pentax WG-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $300 |
