Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was announced 20 months later than the CX1 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-H20G grades against the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-H20G | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-H20G
| CX1 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh CX1
| EX-H20G | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G has exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H20G against the CX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and CX1.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H20G to offer you more detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent EX-H20G should have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $299 |
