Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H20G was brought out 2 months after the CX4 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-H20G matches up against the CX4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh CX4
| EX-H20G | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Casio EX-H20G
| CX4 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh CX4
| EX-H20G | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 |  | August 2010 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G and the CX4.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and CX4.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $211 |
