Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh CX5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was introduced 10 months before the CX5 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-H20G grades against the CX5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh CX5. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh CX5
| EX-H20G | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Casio EX-H20G
| CX5 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 10 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh CX5
| EX-H20G | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G provides outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G against the CX5.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and CX5 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and CX5.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $399 |
