Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was announced 8 years earlier than the G900 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-H20G matches up against the G900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh G900
| EX-H20G | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-H20G
| G900 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 90 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh G900
| EX-H20G | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H20G against the G900.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and G900 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and G900.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to render extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh G900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $752 |
