Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR II

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

The EX-H20G was unveiled 3 years before the GR which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores against the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh GR
EX-H20G | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-H20G
GR | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | ![]() | September 2010 | More modern by 31 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GR
EX-H20G | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G provides external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh GR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H20G vs the GR.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and GR is 91 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The image below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and GR.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H20G with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR will give more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GR |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 300 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $300 | $971 |