Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H20G was unveiled 16 months before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-H20G grades against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-H20G | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-H20G
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | September 2010 | Fresher by 16 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-H20G | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G provides exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 91 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The photograph below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-H20G with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will resolve greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $871 |