Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35


84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly close but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

The EX-H20G was revealed 10 months earlier than the GXR Mount A12 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H20G grades against the GXR Mount A12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-H20G | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-H20G
GXR Mount A12 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | September 2010 | Newer by 10 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-H20G | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G provides outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the GXR Mount A12.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and GXR Mount A12 is 91 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and GXR Mount A12.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-H20G will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $300 | $349 |