Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was introduced 2 months after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-H20G matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX-H20G | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Casio EX-H20G
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX-H20G | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | August 2010 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G offers physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer you greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lb) | 367 gr (0.81 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $300 | $147 |