Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was announced 4 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H20G grades versus the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-H20G | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-4 GPS | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-H20G | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G provides outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G and the WG-4 GPS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $210 |