Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was unveiled 7 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-H20G | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-50 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 81 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-H20G | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the WG-50.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and WG-50.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $300 | $280 |