Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H20G was revealed 12 years earlier than the WG-80 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the WG-80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh WG-80
| EX-H20G | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-80 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 141 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-80
| EX-H20G | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G versus Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the WG-80.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and WG-80 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and WG-80.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $300 |