Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was announced 5 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H20G | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-M1 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 48 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-H20G | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G provides physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G against the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The picture below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and WG-M1.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photos but you really should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $2,000 |
