Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung CL5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") have different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was brought out 20 months later than the CL5 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the CL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung CL5
| EX-H20G | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-H20G
| CL5 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung CL5
| EX-H20G | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G vs the CL5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and CL5.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H20G due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Casio EX-H20G will provide more detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 141g (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $300 | $391 |