Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung HZ10W, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was unveiled 17 months later than the HZ10W which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H20G scores vs the HZ10W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung HZ10W
EX-H20G | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2010 | May 2009 | More recent by 17 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Casio EX-H20G
HZ10W | EX-H20G |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung HZ10W
EX-H20G | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G has external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung HZ10W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the HZ10W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and HZ10W is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and HZ10W.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to give you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-H20G will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung HZ10W |
Also referred to as | - | WB500 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2432 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 249g (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $300 |