Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung ST65, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H20G was unveiled 4 months prior to the ST65 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-H20G grades vs the ST65 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung ST65. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung ST65
| EX-H20G | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-H20G
| ST65 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung ST65
| EX-H20G | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G provides exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G against the ST65.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and ST65.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you should really take the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung ST65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $130 |