Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35


94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Also referred to as ST550

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-H20G was announced 14 months after the TL225 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-H20G scores vs the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung TL225
EX-H20G | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-H20G
TL225 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung TL225
EX-H20G | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G has outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the TL225.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and TL225 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and TL225.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H20G to offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung TL225 |
Also Known as | - | ST550 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-08-13 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1,152k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lb) | 187 gr (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $488 |