Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was unveiled 3 years prior to the WB30F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-H20G scores vs the WB30F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-H20G | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-H20G
| WB30F | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 28 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB30F
| EX-H20G | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G has got exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the WB30F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and WB30F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The image underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and WB30F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB30F to give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 128g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $180 |
