Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was launched 4 years before the WB350F which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-H20G matches up against the WB350F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-H20G | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-H20G
| WB350F | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB350F
| EX-H20G | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G offers exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H20G versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G and the WB350F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and WB350F.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $260 |