Clicky

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
91
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-H20G front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
  • Revealed September 2010
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-H20G was unveiled 4 years before the WB35F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H20G scores against the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-H20G WB35F 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-H20G

 WB35F EX-H20G 
RevealedJanuary 2014September 2010More recent by 40 months

Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB35F

 EX-H20G WB35F 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G provides physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H20G versus the WB35F.

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and WB35F.

As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung WB35F to provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H20G will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography details
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography details
35
manual focus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
37
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Street photography features
Samsung WB35F Street photography features
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than average in class (216 grams)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Sports photography details
Samsung WB35F Sports photography details
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Travel photography details
Samsung WB35F Travel photography details
60
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (216 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
70
lighter than competitors (194g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography info
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography info
46
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse function
43
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
27
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
heavier than average in class (216g)
31
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-H20GSamsung WB35F
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-H20G Samsung WB35F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-09-20 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 216g (0.48 lbs) 194g (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $300 $130