Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was announced 4 years prior to the WB50F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-H20G scores vs the WB50F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung WB50F
EX-H20G | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-H20G
WB50F | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB50F
EX-H20G | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G features exterior dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the WB50F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and WB50F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and WB50F.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB50F to produce extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 207g (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $300 | $180 |