Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H20G was released 3 years earlier than the WB800F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G matches up vs the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-H20G | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-H20G
| WB800F | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | Fresher by 28 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Samsung WB800F
| EX-H20G | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G has got exterior measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G and the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The graphic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H20G and WB800F.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H20G vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $300 |