Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Introduced February 2012
- New Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-H20G versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is very well matched but the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was manufactured 16 months earlier than the DP1 Merrill making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H20G scores versus the DP1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
EX-H20G | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Casio EX-H20G
DP1 Merrill | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 16 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sigma DP1 Merrill
EX-H20G | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G offers external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the DP1 Merrill.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and DP1 Merrill is 91 and 82 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and DP1 Merrill.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will give more detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | - |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $1,250 |