Clicky

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35
Casio Exilim EX-H20G front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
  • Launched September 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-H20G was manufactured 4 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H20G scores against the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H20G DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-H20G

 DP2 Quattro EX-H20G 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014September 2010Newer by 41 months
Screen resolution920k461kCrisper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H20G DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H20G vs the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and DP2 Quattro.

As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Portrait photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography features
35
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
77
has manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Sports photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography info
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
48
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-H20G
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
60
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
53
MP count decent (20MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography factors
46
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
59
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3")
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-H20G
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
27
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
9
can't record video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H20G and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-H20GSigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H20G Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-09-20 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 216 grams (0.48 pounds) 395 grams (0.87 pounds)
Dimensions 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-90 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $300 $931