Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced March 2004
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD9
- Replacement is Sigma SD14
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was unveiled 6 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the SD10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Sigma SD10. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sigma SD10
| EX-H20G | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2010 |  | March 2004 | More recent by 80 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 130k | Clearer screen (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-H20G
| SD10 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sigma SD10
| EX-H20G | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H20G has got external dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H20G versus the SD10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and SD10 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and SD10.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-H20G with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-H20G will result in greater detail having an extra 11MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $198 |