Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Announced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Newer Model is Sigma SD10
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Casio EX-H20G versus Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H20G was brought out 7 years after the SD9 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H20G grades against the SD9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sigma SD9
EX-H20G | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | November 2002 | Newer by 96 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 130k | Crisper display (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-H20G
SD9 | EX-H20G |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sigma SD9
EX-H20G | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H20G versus Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H20G against the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and SD9 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and SD9.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Casio EX-H20G will result in more detail having its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2010-09-20 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 216g (0.48 lb) | 950g (2.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $3,001 |