Clicky

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34
Casio Exilim EX-H20G front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
48
Features
45
Overall
46

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
  • Introduced September 2010
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released January 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Overview

The following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-H20G was released 2 years after the A300 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-H20G scores versus the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony A300

 EX-H20G A300 
ReleasedSeptember 2010January 2008Newer by 33 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Casio EX-H20G

 A300 EX-H20G 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony A300

 EX-H20G A300 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the A300.

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The image below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and A300.

As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-H20G will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-H20G will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H20G
Portrait photography with Sony A300
34
focusing manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
58
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Street photography advice
Sony A300 Street photography advice
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than competition in class (216g)
74
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H20G Sports photography factors
Sony A300 Sports photography factors
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-H20G
Travel photography with Sony A300
60
MP count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (216 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
45
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H20G as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A300 as a Landscape photography camera
46
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
56
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-H20G
Vlogging with Sony A300
27
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition in class (216g)
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H20G and Sony A300
 Casio Exilim EX-H20GSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Casio Sony
Model Casio Exilim EX-H20G Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2010-09-20 2008-01-30
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Macro focus range 7cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 216 grams (0.48 lbs) 632 grams (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery model NP-90 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $300 $0