Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the EX-H20G (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was released 2 years after the A300 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-H20G scores versus the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony A300
| EX-H20G | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 | January 2008 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Casio EX-H20G
| A300 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony A300
| EX-H20G | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H20G comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the A300.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and A300 is 91 and 64 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The image below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and A300.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H20G due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-H20G will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-H20G will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |