Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was introduced 3 years before the H200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-H20G scores against the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony H200
| EX-H20G | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Casio EX-H20G
| H200 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | September 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony H200
| EX-H20G | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G features physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G versus the H200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H20G and H200 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and H200.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Sony H200 to offer you more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 530 grams (1.17 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery type | - | AA |
| Battery model | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $250 |