Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H20G was unveiled 20 months after the T900 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G grades vs the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony T900
| EX-H20G | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-H20G
| T900 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony T900
| EX-H20G | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G versus the T900.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and T900.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-H20G to deliver more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |