Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe EX-H20G was unveiled 20 months after the T900 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H20G grades vs the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony T900
EX-H20G | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-H20G
T900 | EX-H20G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony T900
EX-H20G | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G enjoys outer dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H20G versus the T900.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H20G and T900.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-H20G to deliver more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-H20G provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony T900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 216 grams (0.48 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |