Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony TX200V, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H20G was manufactured 16 months prior to the TX200V which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H20G being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-H20G scores vs the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony TX200V
| EX-H20G | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-H20G
| TX200V | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 16 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony TX200V
| EX-H20G | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H20G has got external measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony TX200V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-H20G vs the TX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and TX200V.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Sony TX200V to produce more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $500 |