Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony W220, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the W220 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H20G was manufactured 21 months after the W220 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-H20G matches up vs the W220 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony W220
| EX-H20G | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Casio EX-H20G
| W220 | EX-H20G |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony W220
| EX-H20G | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G has physical dimensions of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony W220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the W220.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H20G and W220 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The picture here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H20G and W220.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger EX-H20G provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216g (0.48 lbs) | 147g (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $160 |
