Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350
Portability
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Portability
94 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
94 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Key Specs
Casio EX-H20G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
Sony WX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Succeeded the Sony WX300
- New Model is Sony WX500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony WX350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-H20G (14MP) and WX350 (18MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was introduced 4 years earlier than the WX350 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-H20G scores versus the WX350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Sony WX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Sony WX350
| EX-H20G | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX350 over the Casio EX-H20G
| WX350 | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | September 2010 | More modern by 41 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Sony WX350
| EX-H20G | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H20G provides physical measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Sony WX350 has sizing of 96mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H20G versus Sony WX350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H20G compared to the WX350.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and WX350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and WX350.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony WX350 to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H20G is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H20G as a Portrait photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Street photography highlights
Sony WX350 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (164 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Sports photography highlights
Sony WX350 Sports photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (470 shots)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-H20G
Travel photography with Sony WX350
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
better than average battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than competitors in class (164 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Landscape photography info
Sony WX350 Landscape photography info
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H20G Vlogging features
Sony WX350 Vlogging features
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (216 grams)
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (164g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic socket
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX350 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-09-20 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 grams (0.48 lb) | 164 grams (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $270 |