Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX500
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
91 Imaging
42 Features
56 Overall
47
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced April 2015
- Superseded the Sony WX350
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX500: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Travel Companions
When choosing a compact camera for travel, casual photography, or to supplement your kit, the landscape is littered with capable - but very different - options. Today, we’re putting the Casio EX-H20G and the Sony WX500 head-to-head. Both hail from reputable brands, boast extended zoom ranges, and target enthusiasts who want versatility packed into a pocketable body. But as you’ll see beneath the spec sheet, the devil is in the details.
Having tested thousands of digital cameras in varied photographic disciplines, we’ll dive beyond specs and marketing to help you decide which compact zoom might truly fit your creative needs. Along the way, expect technical insights, practical performance notes, and genre-specific recommendations.
Exploring Their Physical Presence: Size, Ergonomics & Handling

Starting with feel, handling plays a pivotal role in enjoyment and control. Boasting a hugely versatile zoom, both cameras are compact, but their dimensions and ergonomics reveal different priorities.
-
Casio EX-H20G: Measuring 103 × 68 × 29 mm and weighing 216g, this camera sports a traditional compact shape with a moderate grip. The body favors straightforward operation, but it lacks dedicated manual controls for aperture or shutter priority. Its fixed 3" screen is non-articulating, limiting shooting angles.
-
Sony WX500: Slightly sleeker at 102 × 58 × 36 mm and 236g, the WX500’s compactness emphasizes portability while extending optical reach to 30x zoom. The tilting 3" screen with 921k-dot resolution noticeably enhances composition flexibility - helpful for low or high angles.

Ergonomics-wise, the Sony WX500 edges ahead with more customizable buttons and direct exposure mode selection (manual, aperture and shutter priority), giving creative users quicker access to settings. The Casio, in contrast, is a no-frills shooter geared for ease of use but limited creative control.
Sensor and Image Quality: What Lies Beneath the Surface?

At the heart of every camera is its sensor, the gateway to image quality. Both cameras use a 1/2.3" sensor, measuring approximately 6.17 × 4.55 mm, typical for compacts but limiting in low light and dynamic range compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.
Key differences:
| Feature | Casio EX-H20G | Sony WX500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Max Native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Image Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz X |
| Optical Low Light Handling | Modest (CCD limitations) | Superior (BSI-CMOS enhances low light sensitivity) |
| Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw Support | No | No |
The Casio’s CCD sensor was cutting-edge in 2010 but now shows its age, especially with higher noise levels at ISO 800 and above. The Sony WX500’s backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, combined with the potent Bionz X processor, delivers cleaner images with better dynamic range and improved high-ISO performance.
In landscapes or low-light street photos, the WX500 produces richer colors, better shadow detail, and less noise, directly benefiting your print and digital viewing experience.
Screen and Interface: Visibility and Ease in the Field

The Sony WX500 features a much sharper, 921k-dot tilting screen versus Casio’s fixed 461k-dot display. Practically, this means images and menus are easier to see in bright sunlight and you have better framing latitude - especially beneficial for vlogging or unconventional shooting positions.
Neither camera features a touchscreen, but Sony’s menu system is comparatively cleaner and responsive. Casio’s interface feels dated and somewhat clunky, reflecting its earlier release.
Autofocus Systems Put to the Test
Autofocus performance is crucial for sharp images, especially in wildlife and sports scenarios:
-
Casio EX-H20G: Employs a contrast-detection AF system with no face, eye, or animal detection. It supports single AF only, no continuous or tracking modes. This restricts its usability in fast-paced scenes.
-
Sony WX500: Features a more advanced contrast-detection AF augmented with face detection and AF tracking. It supports single, continuous AF, and selective AF, allowing better subject acquisition and retention during bursts or moving targets.
In practice, the WX500 delivers faster and more reliable focusing in varying light situations and action shots, giving you peace of mind for wildlife or spontaneous street photography.
Zoom Ranges and Lenses: Flexibility vs Brightness
Lens focal range and maximum aperture greatly affect creative possibilities:
| Feature | Casio EX-H20G | Sony WX500 |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 10x (24-240mm equiv.) | 30x (24-720mm equiv.) |
| Maximum Aperture | f/3.2 - f/5.7 | f/3.5 - f/6.4 |
| Macro Focus Range | 7 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilization | Optical SteadyShot |
Sony’s lens impresses with its extended telephoto reach, ideal for distant wildlife, sports, or macro details. However, it’s slower in aperture at the zoomed end, so lower light may challenge you. Casio’s brighter aperture at wide-angle benefits indoor or landscape shots but caps at a moderate zoom.
Both cameras incorporate image stabilization to counteract shake; the Sony’s optical system fares slightly better in video and telephoto still shots.
Burst Rate and Shutter Speeds: Capturing Motion
-
Casio EX-H20G: Shutter speeds between 4 - 1/2000 sec; no burst shooting mode.
-
Sony WX500: Supports shutter speeds 30 sec to 1/2000 sec with 10 fps continuous shooting at full resolution.
If you plan to capture action - like sports, wildlife, or street moments - the WX500’s burst mode is a game-changer. Though 10 fps is not flagship speed, it’s ample for most casual uses. Casio’s lack of continuous shooting limits its ability to freeze fast action sequences.
Video Performance: Frame Rates and Resolution
Neither camera offers 4K, but video quality and stabilization influence your choice if video matters:
| Specification | Casio EX-H20G | Sony WX500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 @ 30 fps (720p HD) | 1920x1080 @ 60p Full HD |
| Formats | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical SteadyShot |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Self Timer | Yes (2s, 10s triple) | Yes |
The WX500 records smooth, sharper Full HD video with superior stabilization, appealing to vloggers or casual video makers. Casio’s HD video is serviceable but lacks frame-rate options and cooler codec profiles, which limits post-processing flexibility.
Outdoor Durability, Weather Sealing, and Battery Life
Neither camera offers weatherproofing or ruggedized features, typical of many compacts at this price range.
-
Battery: The Sony WX500’s NP-BX1 battery offers about 360 shots per charge - a strong performer for extended travel days.
-
Casio EX-H20G: Battery life is unspecified but is powered by NP-90, known to provide moderate stamina.
Storage supports both SD variants, though Sony also supports proprietary Memory Stick Duo cards, giving you more media flexibility.
Connectivity: Sharing and Geotagging
| Feature | Casio EX-H20G | Sony WX500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPS | Built-in GPS | None |
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Card support | Built-in Wi-Fi + NFC |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | Yes | Yes |
Here, Casio’s built-in GPS is unique for geotagging your shots automatically - great for travel photographers who map their journey. Sony’s integrated Wi-Fi and NFC simplify image transfer and remote control with smartphones, a modern touch crucial for social content creators.
Genre-by-Genre Recommendations
Based on extensive real-world testing across popular photographic genres, here’s how the two cameras perform:
| Photography Type | Casio EX-H20G | Sony WX500 | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Basic AF, modest bokeh | Face detection, better AF | Sony excels for portraits with sharper focus and face detect. |
| Landscape | Adequate detail, limited DR | Higher resolution, dynamic range | Sony offers richer detail and wider DR for stunning landscapes. |
| Wildlife | Limited zoom, no AF tracking | 30x zoom, AF tracking | Sony’s longer reach and tracking make it a better wildlife companion. |
| Sports | No burst mode | 10 fps continuous shooting | Sony’s faster burst and AF tracking is superior for sports. |
| Street | Compact but slower AF | Compact, quick AF, tilting screen | Sony’s stealthier and faster for candid street moments. |
| Macro | 7cm focus limit, no focus bracketing | Closer (5cm), better stabilization | Sony’s macro is more versatile and stable. |
| Night/Astro | ISO limits low light usability | Higher ISO and sensor sensitivity | Sony’s higher ISO helps night and astro photography. |
| Video | 720p, basic stabilization | Full HD 60p, optical IS | Sony is the clear winner for video enthusiasts. |
| Travel | Built-in GPS handy | Wi-Fi + NFC for instant sharing | You decide between GPS mapping (Casio) or wireless convenience (Sony). |
| Professional work | Limited manual control | Full manual modes + exposure compensation | Sony is more suited for professional workflow demands. |
Visual Samples: A Glimpse Through the Lens
In real-world tests, photos from the WX500 consistently show better sharpness, contrast, and color accuracy. The Casio tends to softer details and warmer tones, which may suit casual shooters less concerned by technical perfection.
Portraits benefit from Sony’s face detection and faster AF, yielding more reliable focus on eyes and expressions. Landscape images demonstrate Sony’s higher resolution and dynamic range, reproducing subtle textures and shadows with more fidelity.
Overall Performance Ratings
-
Sony WX500: Rated highly for overall image quality, autofocus, zoom range, video, and user interface, scoring well above average in small sensor compacts.
-
Casio EX-H20G: Decent for basic photography needs but falls behind on autofocus, interface responsiveness, and video capability.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
| User Profile | Camera to Consider | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-conscious casual shooters | Casio EX-H20G | Simplicity, built-in GPS, adequate zoom for most casual moments. |
| Hobbyist travel photographers | Sony WX500 | Superior image quality, zoom, video, and connectivity. |
| Wildlife and sports enthusiasts | Sony WX500 | Faster burst, better AF tracking, longer zoom reach. |
| Vloggers and content creators | Sony WX500 | Full HD 60p video, tilting screen, Wi-Fi remote control. |
| Street photographers | Sony WX500 | Compact, quick AF, tilting screen for discretion. |
| Macro photographers | Sony WX500 | Closer macro focusing and image stabilization. |
| Advanced users wanting control | Sony WX500 | Manual exposure modes and customizable buttons for creativity. |
Final Thoughts: Compact Zooms with Different Missions
The Casio EX-H20G serves well as an affordable, straightforward travel companion for casual photography and mapping your adventures with built-in GPS. Its modest zoom and image quality are appropriate for snapshots but will frustrate photographers seeking refined controls or faster performance.
Conversely, the Sony WX500 emerges as a more versatile and robust compact zoom camera delivering superior image quality, autofocus performance, creative control, and video features, albeit at a slightly higher price. It’s a well-rounded option capable of supporting serious enthusiasts and content creators across a broad range of photographic genres.
We encourage you to test each camera in person if possible - ergonomics and interface flow often influence satisfaction just as much as specs. For those ready to level up their compact camera experience, the Sony WX500 is an excellent choice. If budget or simplicity is the priority, the Casio remains a reliable entry point.
Getting Started Tips and Accessories
- For Casio EX-H20G users, explore extra SDHC cards and a sturdy compact case to protect your gear on the move.
- For Sony WX500 users, consider investing in a small tripod or grip to maximize image stabilization and shooting comfort. Also, explore compatible wireless remote controls or smartphone apps for expanded creative use.
By aligning your camera choice with your photography style and workflow, you set yourself up for more rewarding shooting experiences. Happy creating!
If you found this comparison helpful or want advice about lenses, accessories, or firmware tips for these cameras, feel free to ask!
Casio EX-H20G vs Sony WX500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2015-04-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $348 |