Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Released August 2010
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both produced by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the EX-S200 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H30 was brought out 6 months after the EX-S200 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-H30 matches up vs the EX-S200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Casio Exilim EX-S200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Casio EX-S200
EX-H30 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-H30
EX-S200 | EX-H30 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Casio EX-S200
EX-H30 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | August 2010 | Same age | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 provides exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Casio EX-S200 has measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H30 versus the EX-S200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and EX-S200 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H30 and EX-S200.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-H30 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-08-03 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $709 | $0 |