Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix F85EXR
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-H30 versus FujiFilm F80EXR, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and F80EXR (12MP) and the EX-H30 (1/2.3") and F80EXR (1/2") boast different sensor sizes.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H30 was introduced 7 months after the F80EXR which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-H30 scores vs the F80EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| EX-H30 | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Casio EX-H30
| F80EXR | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and FujiFilm F80EXR
| EX-H30 | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 has got physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm F80EXR has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H30 versus FujiFilm F80EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H30 and the F80EXR.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and F80EXR is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The image below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and F80EXR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H30 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-H30 will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher EX-H30 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H30 vs FujiFilm F80EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR |
| Also called as | - | FinePix F85EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-270mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 210g (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $709 | $400 |
