Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H30 was released 4 years prior to the Fujifilm S9200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-H30 grades vs the Fujifilm S9200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Fujifilm S9200
| EX-H30 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-H30
| Fujifilm S9200 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Fujifilm S9200
| EX-H30 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 enjoys exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9200 has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H30 and the Fujifilm S9200.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and Fujifilm S9200 is 92 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H30 and Fujifilm S9200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you should really consider the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-H30 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 photos |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $709 | $300 |