Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a31a/4a31afb8d902a780d0749693e69c7a37698bc63b" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H30 front Casio Exilim EX-H30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00ff8/00ff8a7cc69039a7d7c49366e0ef68325a64ab53" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front"
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-H30 versus Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-H30 was introduced 4 years earlier than the Fujifilm S9400W which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H30 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H30 scores against the Fujifilm S9400W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Fujifilm FinePix S9400W. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Fujifilm S9400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Fujifilm S9400W
EX-H30 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Casio EX-H30
Fujifilm S9400W | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Fujifilm S9400W
EX-H30 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H30 offers physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9400W has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H30 versus Fujifilm S9400W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H30 against the Fujifilm S9400W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d0e/e4d0ecc197dc72453fca6f94c383de328de0e3df" alt="Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and Fujifilm S9400W is 92 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3a82/c3a822d31f75607b6e3caf72c7c1747179b33fa5" alt="Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP and you can expect similar quality of images but you should always take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H30 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c551d/c551d4c1067fd7aa2e232c3bf01f17837465b25a" alt="Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52ced/52cedda49f094f8f1ce1c3ffa39802e0e0c48bb6" alt="Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-H30 vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 670g (1.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photographs |
Battery style | - | AA |
Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $709 | $330 |