Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-PL3 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very well matched but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL3 was introduced 2 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-PL3 scores versus the SP-565UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL3 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PL3
SP-565UZ | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL3 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 provides outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL3 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL3 vs the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39682/39682b8f4e0168c035d853b9cbf60811bc336c04" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and SP-565UZ is 88 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81805/818055b0ba1d238c29607000404a645d01e06920" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL3 and SP-565UZ.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL3 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL3 will give you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-PL3 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1a23/f1a23aa4a382ce02eb564cae44aa22a2e34d229b" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7873c/7873cd740a5a04325f6659cd78e012778b70e47b" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 499 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $400 |