Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and Z915 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H30 was manufactured 2 years later than the Z915 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-H30 grades against the Z915 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Kodak Z915
EX-H30 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-H30
Z915 | EX-H30 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Kodak Z915
EX-H30 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H30 enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has sizing of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the Z915.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and Z915 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and Z915.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-H30 to offer extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern EX-H30 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H30 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $709 | $200 |