Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
![Casio Exilim EX-H30 front Casio Exilim EX-H30 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio_Exilim_EX-H30_0.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S630 front Nikon Coolpix S630 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S630/Nikon-S630-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 140g - 97 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-H30 and Nikon S630, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and S630 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H30 was unveiled 24 months later than the S630 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-H30 matches up vs the S630 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Nikon Coolpix S630. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Nikon S630 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Nikon S630
EX-H30 | S630 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S630 over the Casio EX-H30
S630 | EX-H30 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Nikon S630
EX-H30 | S630 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 enjoys outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Nikon S630 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H30 and Nikon S630 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H30 vs the S630.
![Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 size comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S630-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and S630 is 92 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S630-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and S630.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-H30 to offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern EX-H30 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S630-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S630-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Nikon S630 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Nikon Coolpix S630 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Nikon Coolpix S630 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 37-260mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | EN-L12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $709 | $240 |