Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38


89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced January 2013

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-H30 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the SZ-16 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-H30 scores vs the SZ-16 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
EX-H30 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Casio EX-H30
SZ-16 iHS | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
EX-H30 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H30 provides exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has specifications of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H30 and the SZ-16 iHS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and SZ-16 iHS is 92 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and SZ-16 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should really factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-H30 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $709 | $230 |