Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38


95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 7030

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus 7030, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the 7030 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-H30 was manufactured 13 months later than the 7030 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-H30 matches up vs the 7030 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Olympus Stylus 7030. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Olympus 7030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus 7030
EX-H30 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Casio EX-H30
7030 | EX-H30 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus 7030
EX-H30 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H30 offers outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Olympus 7030 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus 7030 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H30 and the 7030.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and 7030 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and 7030.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-H30 to give greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern EX-H30 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
Also Known as | - | mju 7030 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 140g (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $709 | $179 |