Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H30 was unveiled 12 months prior to the TG-320 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-H30 scores vs the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-H30 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-H30
| TG-320 | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-H30 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H30 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H30 against the TG-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H30 and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specs. The graphic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H30 and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-H30 to give greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-H30 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $709 | $0 |