Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H30 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H30 was launched 24 months prior to the TG-630 iHS which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H30 scores versus the TG-630 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| EX-H30 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-H30
| TG-630 iHS | EX-H30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| EX-H30 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H30 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H30 compared to the TG-630 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and TG-630 iHS is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H30 and TG-630 iHS.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-H30 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-H30 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $709 | $200 |