Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
![Casio Exilim EX-H30 front Casio Exilim EX-H30 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio_Exilim_EX-H30_0.jpg)
![Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VH-410/Olympus-VH-410-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus VH-410, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H30 was manufactured 19 months earlier than the VH-410 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-H30 matches up versus the VH-410 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H30 and Olympus VH-410. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus VH-410
EX-H30 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-H30
VH-410 | EX-H30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus VH-410
EX-H30 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H30 versus Olympus VH-410 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H30 against the VH-410.
![Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Olympus-VH-410-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H30 and VH-410 is 92 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Olympus-VH-410-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H30 and VH-410.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs however you will need to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-H30 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Olympus-VH-410-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H30-vs-Olympus-VH-410-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus VH-410 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 152g (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $709 | $186 |