Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 201g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H30 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H30 was announced 6 months before the VR-320 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-H30 matches up vs the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H30 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H30 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H30 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-H30 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-H30
| VR-320 | EX-H30 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-H30 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | July 2011 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H30 has outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H30 and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H30 vs the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H30 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H30 and VR-320.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-H30 to resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively.
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H30 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H30 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $709 | $179 |